Home Alarmist errors rebuttal: alarmists’ claims Climate Is Normal IPCC Says Climate Facts Our Best Data Who's Lying? What is Real Science Peer Review proxies Papers Debunking Claims NASA Debunk Antarctic Loss Real Cause of Climate Renewables Corals Trillion Dollar Industry Big Money Scaring green money Russian Money Paid by fossil fuel Warming Stopped Media Lies People are Dying History (politics) Extreme Weather? CO2 didn't warm arctic CO2 & Rate of warming CO2 lags Temperature CO2 Innocent! 1/2 of Warming Wrong Its Warming,But Acidification IPCC_Flawed IPCC Prediction Fail IPCC_Disproved IPCC_PeerReview IPCC Scientists IPCC&CLouds WWF Infiltrated the IPCC Harming People misconduct Data Adjustments Cooling since 1945? Drought, hurricanes etc. Arctic Antarctic Selected Emails Selected Quotes Fraud Of Century? 97 percent of scientists 25% of AMS / 50% JonesInterview An OK Prediction Data Sources False Deadlines Record Temperature Climate Change Truths Its OK to Lie! Energy Facts GridStorage CostlyEnergy Mann's Book Wegman styn_vs_mann Peer Review Error Statistical Errors The Sun Solar OceanHeat Ocean Heat Polar Bears OK AlGore's Errors Ask Questions Climate Models Local Food Threats Why I'm a Skeptic GreenhouseMoon Alternative Energy 1350+ realist papers Conflict of Interest? Muzzeled Scientists How To Argue Common Ground Hurricane No Proof NW Snow Pack James Hansen Consensus The Hockey Stick 650 Dissenters Easy Solution DataQuality Heat Island Is Science Settled? Ocean Level Sea Level sea_&_islands Glaciers Ice Sheets Greenland Gore's Mentor OGWC Articles Summary FinancialPapers OtherMotivations PeakOil Ozone Hole Fracking Acid Rain No Limits Videos Printables Links Briffa et al (1998) data

Debunking the Climate Scam

Billions of Dollars -  Fudged Data  -  Corrupt Scientists

Greedy Green Corporations - Trillion Dollar Prize

No Warming For Two decades - Illiterate Media

Bought and Paid For Organizations


Email WebMaster

Short excerpts of a story at Watts Up With That


Here is the correlation between CO2 and Annual Mean Temperature followed by the correlation between Total Solar Irradiance and temperature.

Solar correlates better than CO2 as a drive of climate!

   Clearly the US annual temperatures over the last century have correlated far better with cycles in the sun and oceans than carbon dioxide. The correlation with carbon dioxide seems to have vanished or even reversed in the last decade.


   Given the recent cooling of the Pacific and Atlantic and rapid decline in solar activity, we might anticipate given these correlations, temperatures to accelerate downwards shortly.      


Read the whole story at  Watts Up With That



Omitted variable fraud: vast evidence for solar climate driver rates one oblique sentence in AR5


71 new papers reported in 2013 demonstrating the Sun controls climate, not man-made CO2


Over 200 peer-reviewed papers demonstrating solar control of climate published since 2010   Local     


over 100 potential solar amplification mechanisms described in the literature.


Peer Reviewed Paper Discovers

Planetary Temperature set only by sun & atmospheric pressure


Saturday, August 22, 2015

New paper confirms the gravito-thermal greenhouse effect on 6 planets including Earth, falsifies CAGW

An important new paper published in Advances in Space Research determines that the Earth surface temperature (as well as the surface temperatures of 5 other rocky planets in our solar system) can be very accurately determined (R2 = 0.9999! & tiny standard error σ=0.0078) solely on the basis of two variables:    


1) atmospheric pressure at the surface, and


2) solar irradiance at the top of the atmosphere,


and without any consideration of any greenhouse gas concentrations or 'radiative forcing' from greenhouse gases whatsoever.


Thus, the paper adds to the works of at least 40 others (partial list below) who have falsified the Arrhenius radiative theory of catastrophic global warming from increased levels of CO2, and also thereby demonstrated that the Maxwell/Clausius/Carnot/Boltzmann/Feynman atmospheric mass/gravity/pressure greenhouse theory is instead the correct explanation of the 33C greenhouse effect on Earth, and which is independent of "radiative forcing" from greenhouse gases.


Using observed data from the planets Earth, Venus, the Moon, Mars, Titan, and Triton, the authors,


   "apply the Dimensional Analysis (DA) methodology to a well-constrained data set of six celestial bodies representing highly diverse physical environments in the solar system, i.e. Venus, Earth, the Moon, Mars, Titan (a moon of Saturn), and Triton (a moon of Neptune). Twelve prospective relationships (models) suggested by DA are investigated via non-linear regression analyses involving dimensionless products comprised of solar irradiance, greenhouse-gas partial pressure/density and total atmospheric pressure/density as forcing variables, and two temperature ratios as dependent (state) variables. One non-linear regression model is found to statistically outperform the rest by a wide margin. Our analysis revealed that GMATs [Global Mean Atmospheric Temperatures] of rocky planets can accurately be predicted over a broad range of atmospheric conditions [0% to over 96% greenhouse gases] and radiative regimes only using two forcing variables: top-of-the-atmosphere solar irradiance and total surface atmospheric pressure [a function of atmospheric mass & gravity]. The new model displays characteristics of an emergent macro-level thermodynamic relationship heretofore unbeknown to science that deserves further investigation and possibly a theoretical interpretation."

Read the rest at:  http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2015/08/new-paper-confirms-gravito-thermal.html   


Link to paper: Emergent model for predicting the average surface temperature of rocky planets with diverse atmospheres

By Volokin and Liez, Advances in Space Research, Aug 18, 2015  (h/t WUWT) (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273117715005712   (A PDF can be downloaded by expanding the paper’s view window to full screen and choosing print.)     


New paper finds ‘robust’ relationship between

cosmic rays and global temperature,

corroborates Svensmark’s solar-cosmic ray theory of climate



Link to paper: Reply to Luo et al.: Robustness of causal effects of galactic cosmic rays on interannual variation in global temperature

By Ye, et al, PNAS, Aug 25, 2015  http://www.pnas.org/content/112/34/E4640.extract


Climatologist Dr. Tim Ball On 97% Consensus:

“Completely False And Was Deliberately Manufactured”!


See more at: http://notrickszone.com/2015/08/24/climatologist-dr-tim-ball-on-97-consensus-completely-false-and-was-deliberately-manufactured/


'97% Of Climate Scientists Agree' Is 100% Wrong   







In late 2015, Soon, Connolly, and Connolly (hereafter SCC15) published a  comprehensive (101 pages) analysis of how the modern anthropogenic global warming (AGW) paradigm has been constructed.  The paper, published in  Earth Science Reviews, is entitled Re-evaluating the role of solar variability on Northern Hemisphere temperature trends since the 19th century.


“...most of the temperature trends since at least 1881 can be explained in terms of solar variability, with atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations providing at most a minor contribution.


What follows is a very brief summary of some of the graphical highlights in SCC15 as well as the fully cited conclusion.  Succinctly, the paper can be divided into 2 parts.


1. The instrumental temperature record has undergone heavy adjustments (a utilization of an urban temperature station siting bias) to allow a better fit with climate models that  presume CO2 emissions drive temperature.


2..  CO2-based climate models do not adequately correlate with Northern Hemisphere (NH) temperature trends of the last 130 years; solar activity changes do correlate well with NH trends — especially when urban bias has been removed from the temperature record.

From: notrickszone.com/2017/04/06/scientists-reveal-how-man-made-global-warming-is-created-via-data-manipulation-dismissing-the-sun/

The peer reviewed paper (soon2015.pdf):  http://www.sciencedirect.com.sci-hub.cc/science/article/pii/S0012825215300349

The Real Cause of Climate Change